Simpliers is the most feature-complete tool in this category — AI rule detection, verification certificates, DM automation and exports. igiveaway.site covers the core draw for free, with no entry ceiling and no account.
| Feature | igiveaway.site | Simpliers |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier shape | No plan-based entry cap | Capped by entries per giveaway |
| Account required | No | No, on the free tier |
| Rule setup | Manual, from your caption | AI-assisted from the caption |
| Winner proof | Public result page | Verification certificate with code |
| DM automation & exports | No | Yes, on paid plans |
Simpliers is the strongest specialist tool in this category, and it is worth being straightforward about that. It does more than igiveaway.site does.
Its AI reads your Instagram caption and fills in the giveaway rules automatically, detecting required mentions, hashtags and participation conditions from the text you already wrote. When a giveaway completes it issues a validity certificate carrying a code, so anyone can independently verify the result. Paid plans add DM automation for contacting entrants, spreadsheet exports, advanced filtering, and the ability to combine contests running across several platforms.
Its pricing has two shapes: a free tier limited by entries per giveaway with a reduced feature set and no registration required, and above that either pay-as-you-go credits or a monthly or yearly subscription.
Any comparison page claiming Simpliers is a basic random picker is wrong. It is a deep product.
If you run giveaways as a significant, recurring part of your marketing, Simpliers likely justifies its cost. Specifically:
The certificate deserves particular mention. For sponsored or prize-regulated giveaways, an independently verifiable code carries more weight than a link to a result page, and that is a genuine capability gap on igiveaway.site's side.
igiveaway.site is deliberately narrower. It does the core job — apply the rules, filter the comments, draw the winner, publish a link — and does not attempt the surrounding workflow.
The main practical difference is the ceiling. Simpliers' free tier is bounded by entries per giveaway; past that you buy credits or subscribe. igiveaway.site has no tiers, so a post that outperforms does not become a purchasing decision at the moment you are trying to announce.
Rule entry is manual here rather than AI-assisted, which is a genuine trade-off. It takes an extra minute, and it means the rules are exactly what you set rather than what a model inferred from your caption — which is occasionally an advantage when a caption is ambiguous, and occasionally just slower.
What you get without paying: minimum unique mentions with your own handle excluded, required keywords, minimum comment length, one entry per user, self-tag exclusion, up to twenty winners per draw, a reason recorded against every excluded comment, and a permanent public result page.
These tools sit at different points on the same line, and the choice is mostly about volume and stakes.
If giveaways are a core channel for you — running often, with sponsors, prizes of real value, or compliance requirements — Simpliers' certificates, automation and exports are worth paying for. That is a real product solving real operational problems, and a free tool will not replace it.
If you run giveaways occasionally, want the rules enforced properly, and mainly need to show your audience the draw was fair, igiveaway.site covers it at no cost and without a ceiling.
A reasonable middle path: use igiveaway.site for routine posts, and reach for a certified draw when a specific giveaway is large or formal enough to need one.